Tuesday, February 9, 2016

Noman Sheikh ~ Male Gaze and Patriarchy


Gigi Hadid Made Her Victoria's Secret Runway Debut
Society suppresses the primitive sexual forces and animal instincts within each of us however art brings the phenomena of the male gaze into a reality. As John Berger defines it, the male gaze refers to the concept where the ideal spectator is male, and all visual arts are depicted for a masculine point of view. He states that gender presence in a painting are distinguishable: “A man’s presence is dependent upon the promise of power which he embodies… the promised power may be moral, physical, temperamental, economic, social, sexual - but its object is always exterior to the man… By contrast, a woman’s presence expresses her own attitude to herself, and defines what can and cannot be done to her. Her presence is manifest in her gestures, voice, opinions, expressions, clothes, chosen surroundings, taste – indeed there is nothing she can do which does not contribute to her presence” (45-46).  Through the concept of a surveyor and surveyed, and thus the objectification of women, Berger states that men act and women appear as, “Men look at women. Women watch themselves being looked at” (47). This is exemplified by lingerie models, called Angels, at the world renowned Victoria Secret’s Fashion Show. To explain this, we must distinguish between naked and nude. Nakedness is a state of being unclothed, whereas nude is being naked for the purpose of being looked at. So, millions of viewers, both male and female viewers, religiously watch models in the nude establishing the new definitions of sexy and must-haves in the upcoming season. By calling the models Angels, Victoria Secret places them on a higher pedestal to be further objectified and aspire women to be just like them. The male viewers watch for the sole purpose of watching the models walk up and down in scantily clad “clothing,” whereas the women not only watch the models, they also watch the men to determine what they like. Furthermore, there is no fashion show like Victoria Secret’s for male models as males do not like to be objectified in the same manner as women are. As such they have somehow developed a way not to be in the same manner as women.


Portrait of a Young Lady and Child as Venus and Cupid
The painting to the left of the King’s mistress, Nell Gwynne, lies here in the nude staring at the paintings spectators. Although she is naked and asserts nudity by becoming objectified for the spectator and by doing so this painting becomes a sign of submission. As such all the different abstracts within the painting do not contribute to her presence rather the mistress is left at the demands of her master, the King. Thus objectifying the mistress through the Male Gaze as the King's property.

Figure of Ideal Woman



The drawing to the right is done by Dürer whom believed the “ideal” nude be constructed from parts from multiple women. For example, take one’s breasts and another’s legs to create an image for male pleasure. This articulates the drive for art to be derived for the male spectator- for his visual pleasure and a sense of sexual drive towards the woman in the drawing. By fantasizing the "ideal" woman by combining parts from multiple women shows the intensity of the male gaze.




BMW Used Car Advertisement
Aston Martin Used Car Advertisement

Premier automakers, BMW and Aston Martin, both have used the Male Gaze to allure customers for their preowned selection. By stating "You know you're not the first" insinuates that these girls have had sex before. They allure male customers through female sexuality by insinuating that their cars like these women are beautiful and probably have had sex before. As such it would not matter if you're not the first driver either.

This establishes the masculine dominance dynamic Bell Hooks depicts as a system of patriarchy. She defines it as, “a political-social system that insists that males are inherently dominating, superior to everything and everyone deemed weak, especially females, and endowed with the right to dominate and rule over the weak and to maintain that dominance through various forms of psychological terrorism and violence” (18). Going back to Berger, as women are not only objectified but also deemed weaker they cannot do anything to contribute to their presence whereas men is never objectified and is there only to show his dominance. This relates to the concept in ancient civilizations where men would hunt and bring back meats to the camp where women bore children and cooked. The physical masculinity was necessary at the time however in modern times, there is no need for such display. Bell Hooks introduces a concept of psychological patriarchy which, “is the dynamic between those qualities deemed ‘masculine’ and ‘feminine’ in which half of our human traits are exalted while the other half is devalued” (33). Moreover, this means the ubiquitous embedded system of patriarchy is actually neither male or female, it is rather the idea of masculinity, or dominance, and feminism, or submissiveness. Submissiveness is attributed to women as they are “deemed” weaker, as such the power of dominance is placed in the hands of men. This system is ubiquitous as it is deeply embedded in education and religious institutions, perfectly exemplified by the fact that God is assumed to be male. In fact, because patriarchy is a dynamic of dominance and submissiveness, both sexes can assume the role of the dominator. Single moms are a prime example as they play the role of the patriarchal father by asserting her dominance over their children. Bell Hooks gives us a flashback into her past where she was beaten to a pulp for being more masculine than her bother, the beating served as, “a reminder to me of my gendered place, it was a reminder to everyone watching/remembering, to all my siblings, male and female, and to our grown-woman mother that our patriarchal father was the ruler in our household” (21). This psychological display of dominance is what keeps the dynamic running by scaring off anyone that seeks to oppose the system. Hooks also speaks about a male who vocalized his anger towards the patriarchy system and how by doing so he became a social outcast. As he grew older, inability to gain acceptance overwhelmed him into conforming into the system where became popular. As such this exemplifies the inability of enough people standing up to the existing system as they are scarred by all the wounded grown children raised in patriarchal homes.
Raised in a middle eastern home, I have grown to acknowledge how embedded this dynamic reveals itself and its power. Furthermore, it gave me the ability to note it within the educational institution, where girls are pushed towards the arts and not towards the sciences like their male counterparts. Even today women do not have the same rights as men due to this underlying system of patriarchy. By not vocalizing my stance on the matter, I believe I am regretfully conforming to the system. In my professional life I do not discriminate between sexes, I try my best to give the job based on merit but I do realize women are not given the same opportunities as men in most cases.

Works Cited
Berger, John. Ways of Seeing. London: British Broadcasting Corporation and Penguin Books. 1972. Print.
Hooks, Bell. "Understanding Patriarchy." 2004. The Will to Change. New York: Atria Books, 2004. 17-33. Print.
Links


No comments:

Post a Comment